Today: 17.Sep.2019

John Shanahan, Editor of Many nuclear power organizations and utilities have contributed to the terrible situation nuclear power is in by passively accepting unnecessary crippling criteria and demands of anti-nuclear organizations. These organizations can't be more pleased. A lot of the public and elected officials are in a state of deep seated fear and misguided understanding about radiation and nuclear power. Before a large new effort for nuclear power can be launched, many things must change. Nuclear organizations must solve real problems holding nuclear power back. With the right leadership, the nuclear industry in the West could be back on track in a few decades. But, this is most likely going to take longer.

Jerry Cuttler, D.Sc. in nuclear sciences and engineering, recipient of 2011 International Dose-Response Society Award for Outstanding Career Achievement:

His main focus was on the enhanced fear of radiation effects subsequent to the tsunami-induced damage to the Fukushima nuclear reactor in Japan in March of 2011.

Some of his main points bear repeating:

• Fukushima radiation same as natural background radiation

• Evacuation resulted in 1600 premature deaths

• Precautionary action was not conservative

• Chronic radiation is beneficial < 700 mGy/year. Radiation becomes harmful > 700 mGy/year (According to the National Council on Radiation Protection, the average person receives about 3.6 mGy/year from background sources and a dental X-ray is about .005 mGy).

• The official policy, linear non-threshold, is invalid, based not on science, but on antinuclear ideology

• End regulations based on politicized science

Published in Low Dose Radiation

Rosatom, the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM is a global technological leader for development of nuclear energy and nuclear science applications. It offers more help than most other leading nuclear energy countries.

Zambia’s agriculture sector has been identified as the key to unlocking economic growth as it provides the main support for the country’s rural economy, and nuclear technology is expected to boost agricultural development even more.

“There is an example from South Africa that shows how nuclear technology has saved the South African’s Western Cape orange industry, which was about to collapse. The application of nuclear technology helped local farmers to put an end to infestation that damaged the environment, seriously affecting the citrus industry that employed 10 percent of South African agricultural labour force.”

Published in Agriculture & Food

William K Terry, Ph.D. nuclear engineering, fusion: Leroy Moore says that one alpha particle can cause a mutation that leads to cancer. Yes, that's true. But that's not the same as saying that you are at significant risk of cancer if one atom of an alpha emitter, such as plutonium-239, is lodged in your lung.

Published in Low Dose Radiation
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Kelvin Kemm, nuclear physicist, Chairman of the…
  • Paul Driessen, senior policy analyst for the…
  • Richard McPherson, electrical power and grid security…
  • James Temple, writer for MIT technology Review:…
  • Richard McPherson, electrical power and grid security…
  • Kelvin Kemm, nuclear physicist, Chairman of the…
  • Paul Driessen, senior policy analyst for the…