Garth Paltridge,retired Australian atmospheric physicist. Visiting Fellow at the Australian National University and Emeritus Professor and Honorary Research Fellow at the Institute of Antarctic and Southern Oceans Studies, University of Tasmania. The bottom line of politically correct thought on the matter—the thought that we must collectively do something drastic now to prevent climate change in the future—is so full of holes that it brings the overall sanity of mankind into question. For what it is worth, one possible theory is that mankind, or a fraction of it has become both over-educated and more delicate as a result of a massive increase of its wealth in recent times. It has managed to remove the beliefs of existing religions from its consideration—and now it misses them. As a replacement, it has manufactured a set of beliefs about climate change that can be used to guide and ultimately to control human behaviour. The beliefs are similar to those of the established religions in that they are more or less unprovable in any strict scientific sense.
World Nuclear Association: 2015: Nuclear societies representing scientists, engineers, and professionals from around the world, signed this declaration stating their conviction that the world needs to take immediate steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and supporting nuclear energy as a key part of the solution in the fight against climate change.
Mother Nature will have the final say whether carbon dioxide from fossil fuels is causing catastrophic man-made global warming and disastrous sea level rise. There are numerous scientific publications, many posted on this website, that say that mankind's carbon dioxide contribution to the total carbon dioxide which is itself a lesser contributor to all the greenhouse gases is not and will not be the cause of catastrophic global warming. We recommend that nuclear experts and nuclear advocates support nuclear energy solely on its own merits. There is no need for nuclear experts to be attacking fossil fuels because of the carbon dioxide they produce. Fossil fuels play a vital role in the modern world and there are few if any replacement technologies at anywhere near the same cost.
John Eidson, electrical engineer: Dr. Happer is one of the best of the best when it comes to knowing about the atmosphere. But because he has doubts about man-made global warming theory, the alarmists who try to scare kids about the climate don’t like him and say ugly things about him. He doesn’t let that bother him. He just does what he’s always done—give his good faith scientific opinion and let the people who don’t like that he speaks his mind say whatever they want. See this short, interesting video. Enjoy life and nature.
Kalte Sonne Newsletter May 15, 2019 - Energy transition from the abyss (Fritz Vahrenholt, Kalte Sonne, German Wildlife Foundation) Germany15.May.2019
Fritz Vahrenholt, PhD Chemistry, Chairman, German Wildlife Foundation: But the beautiful new world of Gretl, Annalena and Robert has its price. The authors anticipated a 60% CO2 reduction, which is expected to be achieved by 2030. By then, that will cost 4300 billion in 11 years. So that the parents of Fridays for the Future understand the 4600 billion correctly: that is 153 billion per year; at 40 million households in Germany each household pays 320 € per month monthly - net. And if it goes to Gretl and her followers, namely in 15 years to achieve 100% renewable energy, then that would be 640 € a month - if it does not sooner come to a collapse of the German energy supply, which is very likely.